Skip to main content

Mobile CI: Illustrated

Surprisingly, our device lab gets a lot of traffic. Many times this is in the form of a guided tour through the office for visiting clients or potential clients. The device lab is a regular stop even though many of our engineers rarely step foot in there. It is almost akin to taking guests on a tour of the server room. The difference is in this case, I've put effort into building an attractive display of all our connected devices. Beyond the display though, the task of visualizing the way in which the hardware on display fits into a Continuous Integration system like Jenkins is a tall order, even for technical people.

The other day I was enjoying some Ikea-related humor and it occurred to me that it would be cool to give the CI system the same treatment. So I give you Mobile CI: Illustrated a la Ikea assembly instructions.

PHOTO SPHERE
Photo credit: R.J. LaCount
Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousMarch 26, 2014 at 8:08 PM

    images missing

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 2x2March 31, 2015 at 11:20 AM

      Wow, I have to say Blogger's message discoverability is terrible. I'm just now seeing this from 1 year ago. I'll make it a point to dig up an image to replace the broken link. Thanks for your feedback!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

UiAutomator and Watchers: Adding Async Robustness to UI Automation

"I'm looking over your shoulder... only because I've got your back." ~ Stephen Colbert After my recent UiAutomator review a user brought up an important question about the use of UiWatcher. The watchers serve as async guardians of the test flow, making sure the odd dialog window doesn't completely frustrate your tests. Having a tool that automatically watches your back when you're focused on the functional flow of your tests is awesome. 100% pure awesomesauce. Since the API documentation on watchers is scant and the UI Testing tutorial on the Android dev guide doesn't cover their use in depth, I figured I should add a post here that goes over a simple scenario demonstrating how to use this fundamentally important UI automation tool. In my example code below, I'm using uiautomator to launch the API Demo app (meaning run this against an Emulator built in API level 17 - I used the Galaxy Nexus image included in the latest ADT and platform tools).
138 comments
Read more

UiAutomator.jar: What happened when Android's JUnit and MonkeyRunner got drunk and hooked up

"Drunkenness does not create vice; it merely brings it into view" ~Seneca So Jelly Bean 4.2 landed with much fanfare and tucked in amongst the neat new OS and SDK features (hello, multi-user tablets!) was this little gem for testers: UiAutomator.jar. I have it on good authority that it snuck in amongst the updates in the preview tools and OS updates sometime around 4.1 with r3 of the platform. As a code-monkey of a tester, I was intrigued. One of the best ways Google can support developers struggling with platform fragmentation is to make their OS more testable so I hold high hopes with every release to see effort spent in that area. I have spent a couple days testing out the new UiAutomator API  and the best way I can think of describing it is that Android's JUnit and MonkeyRunner got drunk and had a code baby. Let me explain what I mean before that phrase sinks down into "mental image" territory. JUnit, for all its power and access to every interface, e
21 comments
Read more

Why Developers Shouldn't Perform Software Testing - A Rebuttal

Take a minute and read the following 2-pager entitled " Guest View: Why developers shouldn’t perform software testing ". Man, I tried to like this article because the author, Martin Mudge, clearly knows that businesses who undervalue quality by trying to eliminate testing through simply shuffling the traditional testing task to developers are making a huge mistake. Unfortunately he begins by making an assertion that testing overburdens a developer which at face value is complete nonsense. If you feel overburdened, it is a timeline issue and that is true no matter WHAT the nature of the tasking is.  So his assertion of “one the most important” contributing factors being overburdening the developers is massively flawed. It gets immediately worse from there because his second point is about time constraints.  Mr Mudge just gets so much wrong. What he really should be shooting down is the idea that testing, as a cost-center not as a task, can be eliminated by having your p
10 comments
Read more